PM Netanyahu’s Cases Unravelling

PM Netanyahu’s case 4000, is unravelling before our eyes. New evidence exonerating PM Netanyahu, was kept from the courts. PM Netanyahu is charged with a quid pro quo, pressuring the Walla newspaper to write favourable reports of him.

Now we have new information, which was hidden from the courts, where the alleged meeting between PM Netanyahu and the newspaper contact, did not even happen! Cell phone data, which the police gave the courts earlier, show PM Netanyahu and the contact did not meet at the time, alleged by the prosecution! (Jewish News Syndicate) Also, the unfavourable reports continued at an alarming rate, over 90%! Where is the quid pro quo?

Although I don’t have any guidance for PM Netanyahu’s three cases, except a burden of the Holy Spirit, I think the best solution is for Herzog to step in, and give PM Netanyahu a full pardon. The alleged cases against PM Netanyahu are dividing the country, fueled by fake media and extremists. The courts cases are also wasting the Prime Minister’s time. Pres. Trump, Rick Joyner and the late Pat Robertson all believe these cases are witch-hunts. I agree.

PM Netanyahu is right, trying to bring a better balance between the Legislative Branch and the Judiciary is essential. The Judiciary is getting out of control, making up cases against PM Netanyahu, just like the cases against Pres. Trump. This has got to stop because it only brings division and destruction, a common strategy of the enemy, Acts 17:6-9, 17:13, 21:27-28.

Let’s pray:

1. All confusion and manipulation in the Justice system and Herzog be bound

2. A right decision by the Courts and Herzog, to favour PM Netanyahu

3. All cases against PM Netanyahu be struck off

3. Wisdom and insight for PM Netanyahu’s lawyers and team

——————————————————————

Jewish News Syndicate:

Solomon testified that cell phone location data never placed Filber together with Netanyahu at the time of the alleged meeting. According to his testimony, the police had assembled a detailed chronology early in the investigation, demonstrating that the meeting did not occur.

Likud officials further allege that evidence in the cases was illegally collected and then selectively leaked to the media during consecutive election cycles, shaping public opinion and influencing electoral outcomes. They also point to the use of state witnesses who, they claim, were subjected to intense pressure and threatened with severe consequences unless they provided testimony aligning with the prosecution’s theory. Read more …